In a recent post, I referred readers to a NY Times piece about abstinence on college campuses which prompted reader Tim to ask me about my thoughts about purity pledges and late starts at sex. Personally, I am not in favor of pledges in relation to sex - I think that teenagers and young adults need to be able to be given the space and accurate information and emotional support to learn about relationships and sexuality, and to make the choices that feel right for them. As for late starts at sex - and by late, I just mean later than average - I certainly don’t think that anyone just have sex at any other time than when they are ready. Some are ready earlier than others; some are ready later than others.
That said, some research has suggested that later-than-average starters may have other sexual or relationship issues that manifest later on - see here and here. Is there something about starting late that causes problems? Or is this just an association? For example, some men or women who start late are men or women who when they were younger felt very nervous about sex, or worried about rejection, or maybe they didn’t feel supported by their families… and maybe these same issues later contribute to other sexual/relationship problems. Similarly, maybe some men or women who start very late have always felt badly about their bodies or felt shameful about sex and that this carries forward to affect them in their adult lives.
That’s not to say that early starters at sex - and average starters at sex - don’t have sexual problems or concerns too. Most of us do, at some point. But for years the focus of some research was looking at what was different about "early" starters… and now we are starting to try to understand the characteristics of all groups (early, average and later starters), so stay tuned. I’m sure more knowledge is on the way.